Arquivos da categoria: Notícias

KONVER recomenda : Years of Living Dangerously Official Trailer (2014)

Published on Nov 1, 2013

Executive producers James Cameron, Jerry Weintraub, and Arnold Schwarzenegger have recruited an all-star cast for an important documentary event. Years of Living Dangerously will air on Showtime in April 2014; it features major celebrities talking to real people who have been negatively effected by global warming. Jessica Alba, Don Cheadle, Matt Damon, America Ferrara, Harrison Ford, Michael C. Hall, Olivia Munn and Ian Somerhalder are just a few of the celebrities who travel the world learning about this issue and sharing their thoughts.

Clima de desalento – FOLHA DE S.PAULO 20/4/2014

Clima de desalento

O impasse internacional na questão do aquecimento do planeta nunca ficou tão claro quanto na terceira e última parte do Quinto Relatório de Avaliação (AR5) do IPCC (Painel Intergovernamental sobre Mudança do Clima). Um abismo separa as recomendações desse corpo de especialistas e a realidade da economia mundial.

Para os 235 autores de 57 países que finalizaram o relatório, o primeiro do IPCC desde 2007, os governos precisam tomar já medidas para diminuir as emissões de gases do efeito estufa. Até 2050, a redução teria de alcançar algo entre 40% e 70% sobre os níveis de 2010.

Sem isso, a atmosfera evoluiria para uma situação de alto risco. Haveria provável aumento na frequência de eventos climáticos extremos, como as secas que assolaram Nordeste e Sudeste do Brasil (para não falar da Califórnia e da Austrália), ou como as enchentes amazônicas no rio Madeira.

Convencionou-se que 2°C é o limiar de elevação da temperatura média global que seria imprudente ultrapassar. Para mitigar tais riscos é que se exigem as reduções aventadas pelo IPCC.

Idealmente, os cortes nas emissões já deveriam ter sido iniciados. Mas o processo de negociação da Convenção do Clima, aprovada em 1992 no Rio, andou muito mal até aqui. Divergências entre países ricos, emergentes e pobres sobre repartição de responsabilidades e custos da mitigação deram em becos sem saída.

Com isso, mais a revitalização dos combustíveis fósseis propiciada pelo boom do gás de xisto nos Estados Unidos, as emissões seguiram crescendo, em vez de cair. E, pior, num ritmo até mais rápido do que em décadas anteriores.

De 2000 a 2010, a taxa de incremento ficou em 2,2% ao ano. Nos três decênios anteriores, a média anual havia sido de 1,3%. Vale dizer, a economia mundial pisou mais fundo no acelerador do aquecimento global, mesmo com a crise de 2008/2009.

Para alcançar até 2050 a pretendida diminuição de emissões, ela teria de começar no máximo em 2020. Ora, se o mundo seguiu na contramão pelos últimos 22 anos, como esperar que em apenas seis possa reverter tal curso, em especial quando a Europa e boa parte dos países pelejam para reviver economias que patinam?

O corte nas emissões exige nada menos que uma revolução energética, em direção às fontes renováveis. Não é algo que se possa obter em uma ou duas décadas, sobretudo porque demandará investimentos que poucas nações se acham em condições de realizar.

Clique aqui para ver o artigo publicado no editorial do jornal Folha de S. Paulo 20/4/14

KONVER estabelece parceria com a FKuR – Plastics made by nature!®

NOTÍCIA 07/03/14  KONVER estabelece parceria com a FKuR – Plastics made by nature!® www.fkur.com empresa especialista em compostos Bioplásticos na Europa, para representação de seus produtos  e desenvolvimento de novos negócios com materiais de fontes renováveis.

Por que Bioplásticos? Veja o vídeo “Time to change” (How to change from fossil to renewable resources) mostrando a sustentabilidade dos Bioplásticos.

Vídeo produzido pela FKuR®

” It’s not just about “saving” this planet, but about learning how to live on it “                                Cradle to Cradle, by Michel Braungart and William McDonough

Looking at packaging sustainability from a different angle

By Heather Caliendo
Published: February 6th, 2014

Oftentimes when I write about sustainable plastic packaging, I can’t help but wonder – do consumers understand what that means?

This is why I’ve read with interest a news release from the Canadian Plastics Industry Association (CPIA) that looked at the connection between plastic food packaging and sustainability. The association said that many people assume that packaging must be recyclable to be “sustainable.” And no one is disputing the power of recycling: recycling reduces energy use, and it cuts greenhouse gas. Plus, recycling industries create significantly more and better jobs than simply hauling and burying garbage. Simply put, when materials have value, burying them in a big hole in the ground is an egregious waste of resources.

“But looking only at recycling when reviewing the sustainability of packaging is sort of like choosing a spouse based solely on good looks – there’s lots more to consider,” the CPIA stated. In fact, there actually are standards for measuring environmental sustainability that look at impacts across the entire “life cycle” of packaging. This includes all the material and energy inputs and outputs of the packaging. We need to look at energy used in manufacturing, water use, energy used in transportation, greenhouse gas and other emissions, impacts of solid waste disposal, and so on, the CPIA stated.

And then there’s the big impact: food waste. Just imagine all the energy and resources invested in growing, protecting, delivering, preparing, and serving our food, and the accompanying impact on the environment, they wrote. To protect that investment, we should use the packaging that delivers more food with less food waste and packaging waste. (PlasticsToday covered plastic packaging’s role in food waste last year).

The CPIA stated that this is precisely where plastic packaging contributes to sustainability.

“The very nature of plastics – lightweight yet strong – makes them ideal for all sorts of packaging and helps minimize the environmental impact of the packaging,” the association stated. “A recent life cycle study compared six types of plastic packaging (caps and closures, beverage containers, other rigid containers, carrier bags, stretch/shrink wrap, and other flexible packaging) to the alternatives made with other materials.”

In essence, CPIA states, this means that plastic packaging delivers more food with significantly less waste, energy use, and global warming potential.

“In addition to these benefits, plastic packaging can provide barriers to oxygen, light, temperatures, moisture, microbes, critters and dirt, which can greatly extend the shelf life of food and retard spoilage – leading to less food waste,” the CPIA stated. “Studies find that up to 10 times more resources (materials, energy, water) are used to make and distribute food than are used to make the packaging that protects it. In the case of plastic packaging, the numbers can be even better – for example, only three percent of the energy used to produce a loaf of store-brought bread is needed to make its thin, lightweight plastic bread bag.”

And they rounded out the story with this: “More food delivered without damage and loss. Less packaging waste. Less food waste. Now that’s a healthy contribution to sustainability.”

I like that the CPIA took a different approach when talking about packaging sustainability. I think so often we get caught up in all things green – that we forget what exactly sustainability means. It’s not limited to just this thing or that thing. For example, if packaging can truly help reduce the world’s food waste problem, that’s a sustainability story everyone can get beyond.

ALMACO e IPT desenvolvem tecnologias que viabilizam a reciclagem dos compósitos

Resíduos já estão sendo usados na fabricação de pisos automotivos e peças de estações de tratamento de água.

Reciclar compósitos, um tipo de plástico de alta performance, é uma atividade bastante complexa. Em qualquer lugar do mundo, o reaproveitamento do material sempre esbarrou em dificuldades técnicas e econômicas. Agora, porém, encontrou-se no Brasil uma saída – ou melhor, várias. Criado em 2010 pela Associação Latino-Americana de Materiais Compósitos (Almaco) e o Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas (IPT), o Programa Nacional de Reciclagem chegou ao fim apontando soluções que viabilizam, de uma vez, a reutilização dos compósitos.

Orçado em R$ 2 milhões, o programa foi financiado por um consórcio de 23 empresas – Ashland, Astecma, CCP, Clariquímica, Comil, CPIC, Edra Equipamentos, Elekeiroz, Fiacbras, LORD, Luxtel, Marcopolo, Morquímica, MVC, Novapol, Owens Corning, Piatex, Plaquimet, Poliresinas, Redelease, Reichhold, Royal Polímeros e Tecnofibras – que têm o direito de explorar comercialmente as tecnologias desenvolvidas.

Os trabalhos do Programa Nacional de Reciclagem foram divididos em duas etapas. A primeira, concentrada no reaproveitamento dos resíduos no próprio processo produtivo, contemplou estudos de trituração e moagem, seguidos por pesquisas acerca da inertização dos catalisadores (são responsáveis pela cura dos compósitos). A segunda fase foi dedicada à análise dos novos usos para os rejeitos, a partir da seleção de materiais e avaliação das suas propriedades.

“No passado, a única alternativa era a moagem e a utilização do pó como carga, material de pouco valor, só que muito mais caro de ser obtido do que as cargas minerais, como talco e calcita. O grande diferencial do programa foi baixar o custo de obtenção do agregado e transformá-lo em reforço das peças, e não apenas num elemento de preenchimento”, explica Paulo Camatta, gerente executivo da Almaco.

Participantes do programa, caso da moldadora MVC, já estão utilizando os rejeitos como substitutos dos compensados de madeira de pisos de ônibus e vans – as peças contêm de 85% a 100% de resíduos de compósitos. “Há outros integrantes usando o material reciclado para fabricar peças de estações de tratamento de água e esgoto, pisos de madeira plástica e painéis isolantes térmicos, além de diversas aplicações combinadas com concreto, mármore sintético e elastômeros. Em suma, a reciclagem dos compósitos já é uma realidade no Brasil”, ele comemora.

Daqui para frente, informa Camatta, a Almaco se dedicará ao Programa de Sustentabilidade, nome do conjunto de ações que visam à divulgação e implementação das alternativas desenvolvidas pelo trabalho concluído agora. Com isso, a ideia é reduzir em 10% até o final de 2014 o volume de compósitos descartados em aterros sanitários Classe 2. Segundo estimativas da associação, 20.000 toneladas de resíduos foram geradas no Brasil em 2012, o que correspondeu a uma despesa com descarte de, aproximadamente, R$ 130 milhões. Ano passado, o setor brasileiro de compósitos produziu 206.000 toneladas e faturou R$ 2,984 bilhões.

Resultantes da combinação entre polímeros e reforços – por exemplo, fibras de vidro – os compósitos são conhecidos pelos elevados índices de resistência mecânica e química, bem como pela versatilidade. Há mais de 50 mil aplicações catalogadas em todo o mundo, de caixas d´água, tubos e pás eólicas a peças de barcos, ônibus e aviões. www.almaco.org.br 

Clique aqui para ver o artigo original publicado na Revista Fator Brasil

Araraquara perde fábrica da JBF e investimento de R$ 1 bilhão

Araraquara perde fábrica da JBF e investimento de R$ 1 bilhão

Acordo com Coca-Cola é desfeito, segundo apurado; Prefeitura aguarda posição oficial da empresa.
27/11/2013 – 14:52
Araraquara.com – Da Reportagem – Tribuna Imprensa

Anúncio da vinda da JBF para Araraquara, em setembro de 2012, reuniu o prefeito Marcelo Barbieri, o deputado estadual Roberto Massafera, empresários indianos (direita) e o presidente da Coca-Cola Brasil, Xiemar Zarazúa (Foto: Assessoria de Imprensa/Divulgação)
A parceria entre a empresa indiana JBF Industries e a Coca-Cola, que traria uma fábrica de garrafas PET para Araraquara, foi desfeita. Com isso, a cidade perde investimento de R$ 1 bilhão e criação de pelo menos 1,6 mil empregos diretos, segundo apurou a Tribuna Impressa.

A confirmação da vinda da JBF para Araraquara foi anunciada com pompas no ano passado, no Palácio dos Bandeirantes, em São Paulo.

O fim da parceria entre as duas multinacionais ainda não é oficial para a Prefeitura.

O secretário de Ciência, Tecnologia, Turismo e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Antônio Martins, afirma que recebeu informações extraoficiais sobre a desistência do investimento da JBF, não só em Araraquara, mas também em todo o País. A Prefeitura aguarda um comunicado oficial da empresa indiana.

“Não temos nada de concreto. Não posso afirmar oficialmente que a empresa desistiu de investir em Araraquara. Soubemos da informação em ‘off’ e aguardamos um posicionamento da executiva da JBF”, diz.

Mas a reportagem apurou que o terreno onde seria a instalação da fábrica já foi vendido pela JBF, o escritório em Araraquara, fechado e 20 funcionários daqui, remanejados para outras cidades.

R$ 1 bilhão

Em setembro do ano passado, foi anunciado que Araraquara receberia a maior fábrica do País de produção de biomeg, um polímero plástico feito a partir da cana-de-açúcar. A Coca-Cola detém a patente e absorveria toda a produção.

As obras deveriam começar ainda no ano passado. Estimativa é que seriam gerados mais de 1,6 mil empregos. A produção seria de 500 mil toneladas do polímero por ano.

Na época, o setor sucroalcooleiro de Araraquara e região viu a novidade com entusiasmo e como uma oportunidade de novos negócios para o setor.

Empresas ainda não se pronunciaram

A ‘Tribuna’ tentou contato com a Coca-Cola e a Investe SP (Agência Paulista de Promoção de Investimentos e Competitividade), que fez o intercâmbio na negociação entre as empresas e a Prefeitura.

A assessoria da agência afirmou que não tem informações sobre um possível cancelamento do acordo.

Já a assessoria da Coca-Cola informou que se pronunciaria hoje, pois não daria tempo de checar as informações com os responsáveis ontem.

A JBF não tem representantes no Brasil, apenas no exterior. A Investe SP tem esses contatos, mas alegou não poder passá-los à reportagem.

Urban Schools Aim for Environmental Revolution

By Michael Wines
Published December 1 , 2013 – New York Times

 

Joshua Bright for The New York Times

Nothing seemed special about the plates from which students at a handful of Miami schools devoured their meals for a few weeks last spring — round, rigid and colorless, with four compartments for food and a fifth in the center for a carton of milk.

Looks, however, can be deceiving: They were the vanguard of what could become an environmental revolution in schools across the United States.

With any uneaten food, the plates, made from sugar cane, can be thrown away and turned into a product prized by gardeners and farmers everywhere: compost. If all goes as planned, compostable plates will replace plastic foam lunch trays by September not just for the 345,000 students in the Miami-Dade County school system, but also for more than 2.6 million others nationwide.

That would be some 271 million plates a year, replacing enough foam trays to create a stack of plastic several hundred miles tall.

“I want our money and resources for food going into children, not in garbage going to the landfill,” said Penny Parham, the Miami school district’s administrative director of food and nutrition.

Compostable plates are but the first initiative on the environmental checklist of the Urban School Food Alliance, a pioneering attempt by six big-city school systems to create new markets for sustainable food and lunchroom supplies.

The alliance members — the public school systems in Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, Miami, New York and Orlando, Fla. — are betting that by combining their purchasing power, they can persuade suppliers to create and sell healthier and more environment-friendly products at prices no system could negotiate alone.

“We pay about 4 cents for a foam tray, and compostable trays are about 15 cents — but volume is always the game changer,” said Leslie Fowler, the director of nutrition support services for the Chicago school system. “We want to set the tone for the marketplace, rather than having the marketplace tell us what’s available.”

The compostable plates are the first test of the alliance’s thesis. This week, the New York City Education Department will open sealed bids to supply the roughly 850,000 plates it needs each day for breakfast and lunch programs in about 1,200 schools. New York is running a pilot program, like Miami’s, in four schools, with 30 more expected to join this month.

If a winning bidder is chosen, the other alliance members will be able to piggyback on the contract, placing their own orders without having to navigate a separate bidding process. The call for bids names all six districts and says they must all be allowed to place orders at the same price.

The alliance’s next target is healthier food. It is already looking at potential suppliers of antibiotic-free chicken. School officials say possible future initiatives include sustainable tableware, pesticide-free fruit and goods with less packaging waste.

The direct benefits of these efforts may not always be obvious, or even noticeable. To a child, antibiotic-free chicken tastes like any other chicken. And even a huge purchase by the alliance would have little effect on farmers’ preferences for giving animals antibiotics, much less on the danger the practice poses: spawning new classes of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

But short-term environmental and health benefits are not the only goals, said Eric Goldstein, the chief executive of school support services in New York City. Using recyclable plates or serving healthier chicken sets an example that students may carry into adulthood, he said, and that other school systems may come to see as a standard.

“It sounds corny,” Mr. Goldstein said, “but we all believe in this.”

The six districts banded together in July 2012 at a school-nutrition conference in Denver. They received a lift later last year when the Natural Resources Defense Council, a national advocacy group with a history of pressing governments for environment-friendly changes, met with Mr. Goldstein and other New York school executives to talk about recycling and healthier food.

“We were pleasantly surprised when they told us they were interested both in getting rid of polystyrene trays and moving forward on healthier chicken,” said Mark Izeman, the director of the council’s New York program.

The council has recruited a law firm to create a nonprofit corporation for the alliance and lent its environmental expertise to help the six districts decide what to buy next. “We’re delighted to work with them,” Mr. Izeman said. “What’s not to like?”

If the alliance succeeds, it could help change nutrition and sustainability policies across the nation. Already, other school districts are asking to join the group. Eventually, Mr. Izeman said, the alliance could be a template for sustainability efforts by other big food bureaucracies. What works for school districts, after all, should also work for institutions like hospitals and universities.

But first, it has to work in public schools. For now, that means producing a compostable plate that school systems can afford.

That may not be easy. Foam trays are made from petroleum byproducts and are stamped out at dizzying rates. Sugar-cane plates take longer to make and require more machinery to produce in volume, said an official at one manufacturer of recycled tableware who did not want to be named because his company is involved in the alliance bid.

Mr. Goldstein said that 21 manufacturers had expressed interest in bidding, and that he believed they would slash prices to win such a huge contract.

But if not, the manufacturing official said, there is a way for alliance members to recoup some of the cost. Demand for compost is high, and by late next year, schools may be deluged with it.

“Budgets are always tough,” the official said. “They could sell that mulch, a buck or two a bag.”

Click here to see the original article published at New York Times

If you’re involved in plastics, you should care about recycling

By Heather Caliendo
Published: November 8th, 2013

Chicago – Plastic bottles scattered across a beach. Plastic bags clinging to a tree. These are a few of society’s (un)favorite things.

“My apologizes for the uncomfortable pictures – but they are powerful images,” said Kim Holmes, director of recycling and diversion at SPI, who showed pictures of plastic litter at the Global Plastics Summit. “The perception of plastics is often a negative interaction with plastics – the material littering the environment.”

Holmes said people don’t seem to feel conflicted over glass, aluminum and paper. In fact, people feel good about recycling them.

“There has never been a proposed ban exclusively on paper bags, despite the fact that they have a higher carbon footprint, they are more expensive and they produce methane at the end of life,” she said. “They are widely accepted in curbside recycling programs and therefore perceived as better for the environment.”

During his presentation at the Global Plastics Summit, Dow Chemical’s Greg Jozwiak talked about shale gas providing an addressable market opportunity in packaging for PE.

The packaging industry was a $173 billion industry in 2012, with about paperboard accounting for $57 billion. PE in packaging was reportedly $12.3 billion.

But unless the overall perception of plastics changes, material substitution will be an uphill battle.

“Expanding the use of plastic in packaging will be a challenging thing to do if people don’t feel good about the product,” she said. “Proactively expanding recycling and recovery for plastics should be a priority for everyone in this room.”

According to the EPA, there was a 8.3% recovery rate for all plastics in 2011. Also in 2011, 4.5 billion lb of plastic was recovered in the U.S.

Demand for U.S. post-consumer recycled plastic is expected to rise 6% per year to nearly 3.5 billion lb in 2016, according to the Freedonia Group.

With regards to PCR, some of the traditional end markets include food packaging, fiber applications and plastic lumber. However, Holmes believes there’s opportunity to increase it into other applications such as computers and refrigerators.

Holmes said that there is a very strong business case for offering recycled resins. A recent 2013 survey of SPI members revealed 68% of respondents have been asked by customers to offer or use recycled resins. Specifically for packaging, a California rigid packaging law requires 25% PCR content on most packaging.

“Converters making high performance, UL-rated and other critical parts will need recycle content plastics from resin suppliers who can provide tractability and performance warranties,” she said.

“We need to all work to change the perception of plastic to make it become the material of choice,” she said. “Work recycling into your business models – I highly encourage you all to do so.”

I was glad to see that the conference had Kim speak to the audience of plastic professionals about sustainability. It’s such a key topic. The reality is even though you may believe plastics is the superior material, there is a negative public perception about it. Instead of assuming people just aren’t educated – do something about it. Like Kim said, work recycling into your business models. Look into using recycled content.

After all, not all materials can be reused like plastics, so why not make the most out of it?

Click here to see the original article published at Plastics Today